Editorial policy
We explain clearly
and leave a path for verification.
Nalja Archive applies the following principles so readers can distinguish claims from sources and general information from the publisher's own perspective.
We prioritize primary sources.
Research findings and definitions are checked against academic papers, government and international-organization documents, and official materials from specialist institutions. We do not rely on summary articles alone and provide an accessible source URL and publication year whenever possible.
We separate general information from Nalja's perspective.
Findings supported by research or public documents are not presented as identical to the educational perspective adopted by Nalkku. When we describe a product or activity, we state its scope and limitations and do not guarantee outcomes.
We record revisions.
When a source, figure, product detail, or explanation changes, we update the article's revision date. If a correction changes the central conclusion, the article identifies what changed.
We protect people represented in examples.
Identifiable examples require the consent of the person concerned or a legally authorized representative. We omit personal information that is not necessary and describe adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities as people who learn and make choices.
We investigate reported errors.
If you find incorrect information or a broken source, please use the contact channel on the official Nalja Books website and include the article title and the passage in question. We will recheck the primary source and make any necessary correction.